Your 3D Printer Is Not a Gun Factory. Washington Legislators Disagree.

I've been quiet about Washington's HB 2320. That changes now.Before anyone reads this as a gun politics piece, I need to set some context. It's not.I'm Norwegian. I live in Norway. I don't own a firearm, and I've never designed or printed anything weapon-related. I've been 3D printing since 2018: miniatures, functional parts, art pieces, community projects. That's the world I come from, and that's the lens I'm looking at this bill through. I built TinkerAtlas because I believe in this community, in makers, tinkerers, hobbyists, and small creators who are building incredible things with affordable manufacturing tools.I am not a gun rights advocate writing to defend the Second Amendment. I'm a maker writing to defend makers.And if you're a gun owner, a sport shooter, or someone who exercises their legal right to manufacture firearms at home, this bill should concern you too. But you don't need me to make that argument. You already know. What I can tell you is that this bill reaches far beyond firearms, and that's the part that isn't getting enough attention.Right now, makers in Washington state need defending.I've watched this bill move through the Washington legislature without saying much publicly. Two reasons. First, I've been heads-down building TinkerAtlas every single day as a solo founder, pouring everything I have into keeping a community platform alive and growing. That doesn't leave a lot of bandwidth for political fights.But the bigger reason? I didn't believe a bill with language this broad would make it this far. I assumed the drafting would be tightened somewhere in the process. In committee, on the floor, somewhere. I was wrong. HB 2320 passed both chambers and is now sitting on Governor Ferguson's desk, waiting for a signature. It passed 58-38 in the House and 29-18 in the Senate.¹ It takes effect immediately as an emergency measure. This is real.When a Norwegian guy who sculpts models and runs a maker community is sounding the alarm about an American firearms bill, the bill has a serious problem.When the net is wider than the target.I have no objection to regulating the manufacture of illegal firearms. People have been hurt and killed by untraceable firearms. That's not in dispute, and this article isn't trying to minimize that. Washington has had laws against manufacturing ghost guns since 2019, with further restrictions added in 2022. Enforcing those laws is reasonable. Strengthening them may be too.The problem with HB 2320 isn't the goal. It's the execution.The bill explicitly names 3D printers and CNC milling machines as instruments of concern. These are tools with thousands of legitimate applications. Then it adds the undefined catch-all phrase "or other means." Critics have warned that the phrase gives the state leeway to apply the law to traditional tools or methods, expanding its reach well beyond the digital realm.² Is a drill press "other means"? A manual mill? A lathe?When your criminal statute singles out general-purpose manufacturing tools by name alongside weapons, you send a message, intentional or not, that those tools are inherently suspect. That message has consequences far beyond anyone who has ever thought about manufacturing a firearm. It reaches into every makerspace, every school workshop, every garage where someone is printing parts for a drone, a prosthetic, or a broken dishwasher.The stated target is ghost guns. The actual blast radius covers the entire ecosystem of digital manufacturing: the tools, the files, the communities, and the people who use them for purposes that have nothing to do with weapons.The technology they're mandating doesn't exist.HB 2320 has a companion bill, HB 2321, and it shows how poorly the technology was understood when these bills were written.HB 2321 would require all 3D printers sold in Washington to include a "firearms blueprint detection algorithm" that automatically identifies and blocks print requests for firearms or illegal parts.³ Violations would carry Class C felony penalties of up to five years imprisonment and $15,000 in fines for corporations.⁴The bill's own sponsor admitted it was "filed intentionally as a conversation starter."⁵ A conversation starter that carries a five-year prison sentence.The technology they want doesn't exist. No commercially validated firearm detection technology exists for 3D printers.⁴ None. Zero. It's not that the industry hasn't caught up yet. The concept itself doesn't work.Dan Shapiro, CEO of Seattle-based laser engraver company Glowforge, put it plainly: these machines interpret raw geometry, squares, circles, and curves, and the software lacks the context to identify a specific end product.⁵ A cylinder is a cylinder. It could be a barrel, or it could be a vase, a pipe fitting, a telescope housing, or a pen holder. You'd need an algorithm that looks at a collection of shapes and determines whether they could become a gun and only a gun. That's not a difficult engineering challenge. It's an impossi

Loading TinkerAtlas

Your 3D Printer Is Not a Gun Factory. Washington Legislators Disagree.

Support TinkerAtlas

Tags:

Comments (0)

Your 3D Printer Is Not a Gun Factory. Washington Legislators Disagree.

Support TinkerAtlas

Tags:

Comments (0)